continue with the theme of love for a while. We could consider a sense of dialectical character where the thesis is in love, the antithesis of love (full), and the mediation of the two above would be forgotten, contempt, hatred, etc. Besides being a funny feeling itself same, the same dialectic is also because its development is not full at the end of the triad but in the second step. Understand love as love Ortega, not love.
Another characteristic of love is, spatially speaking, be nothing more than a small place to put one foot and maintain balance, taking care not to fall to either side, contempt / no appreciation and hatred. The possibility of this fall just keep inside the love and not love, because when the mere physical attraction or just another attraction, say such minor changes from attraction is easy to fall. But not the other way, leaving only the possibility that you throw, it is also feasible.
phase of infatuation in the first instance affect the visual. What we see is the framework through which to observe the other qualities of, say, the person object. At this level would put the love and not love, and Kierkegaard's aesthetic stage that has not happened to ethics, being the boring repetition (the attraction ceases to be) and of course lead to the failure of love, not defend it here as such.
The jump of the loves to love would be to seek the happiness of others without seeking their own, although this is not entirely true, because if we want their happiness is something, and in this case, for our own happiness, so that the ultimate goal is not really happiness but our own. For me it is the least selfish of human feelings. Kierkegaard would hop aesthetic to the ethical subject, where repetition is no longer boring, but "fun", a continuous rediscovery.
For Aristotle also the perfect degree of friendship also situated here.
So, beware the language and speak of love without talking about the love: P
PS: I copied this directly from fotolog, who was writing for a few days, I say this for some time reference that can not be sense, as the beginning.
0 comments:
Post a Comment